Polk EuroCar Seminar – Hybrid Questions & Answers

Monday, February 8, 2010 by Guest Blogger
After the EuroCar Seminar on 20 January 2010, we posted the top ten questions asked by OEM and OES delegates in attendance. Today I will be answering questions pertaining to hybrids. If you missed Norm Marks answers to the Marketing questions, you can find them here. Tanja Linken will be answering questions aboout Network Planning in the next blog entry.

With regard to CO2 emissions, hybrids and zero emission vehicles, do you have any insight into vehicle whole life costs?

This question targets the cost of vehicle construction, battery cost including disposal and the vehicle running costs. The variety of calculations regarding life costs is still quite large. While it is not yet clear whether the retail prices for hybrid vehicles allow for a financial break-even to occur, in some premium models the hybrid drive is extremely expensive which can prevent a break-even from happening. The highest costs in car driving appear to be the loss in value on the one hand and the running costs (mainly fuel). So very much depends on the residual values for alternative cars and their general acceptance and the price relationship between the different fuel types in the future. The term "zero emission vehicles" is also a bit misleading as EVs (electric vehicles) do not emit while driving, but they still need energy for battery recharging. Dependent on the energy mix used in the production process, EVs might emit more CO2 than small diesel or petrol engines.

Is the development of fuel efficient vehicles dependent on the oil price going to $600 a barrel?

There are different scenarios regarding the future oil price development. Polk expects a price of ~$130 towards 2020, others expect $300 or even $600 per barrel. During 2008, oil became quite expensive with almost $150/barrel by the middle of that year. The pressure to develop alternative drives for cars increased. New regulations (e.g., those related to fleet consumption and CO2 emissions) force the public to reduce the fuel consumption of their vehicles. We expect to see both an improvement in conventional combustion technology by engine downsizing, optimized engines, start-stop systems, etc., as well as an expanded model offer in advanced technologies like hybrid or EV. With higher oil prices, there will be higher pressure to develop new technologies as well as pressure to reach financial break-even points for alternative energies.

What is the difference between plug-in hybrids, pure full hybrids and mild hybrids?

A plug-in hybrid vehicle is similar to a conventional full hybrid vehicle—both use a combustion engine as well as an electric motor. However, a plug-in hybrid uses larger battery packs that can be recharged by connecting to common household electricity. In full hybrid vehicles, the electric motor and the internal combustion engine are installed so that they can both individually or jointly power the vehicle. For shorter distances the vehicle can be propelled in its EV mode solely, which eliminates emissions. Mild hybrids use a generally compact electric motor to give extra output during the acceleration, and to generate on the deceleration phase. With mild hybrids, the vehicle cannot be powered by the electric motor exclusively.

Do you have any evidence that customers are driving shorter distances as a result of economic conditions?

At the moment we don't have any evidence for this development. The tightening of economic conditions has affected all kinds of industries dealing with transportation. Nevertheless private mobility is of common interest. With the overall trend of rising costs of ownership, the private driving behaviour might change and result in decreasing mileage, but this depends on the development of the costs of alternative means of transportation.

Thank you for taking the time to read my blog entry. If I left anything out that you would like answered, please submit a comment and I will be happy to address it!

Posted by Thomas Mawick, Manager, Automotive Studies, Europe, Polk (02.08.10)

Asymmetrical Vehicles – Just to Stand Out?

Friday, October 2, 2009 by Guest Blogger

I was driving North on I-75 in Metro Detroit the other week when I saw my first Nissan Cube – I did the double take and then followed it for a few miles just to make sure I wasn’t seeing things. OK – it really isn't symmetrical back there, is it? OEMs have been known to release vehicles with minor differences from side to side, but Nissan is the first one that stands out in my memory as delivering a vehicle with intentional, significant, 'in your face', structural differences. Why?

I was curious so I did a little more research into the Cube. It appears that the differences are not structural at all. The rear glass has metal on both sides and a complete frame that it fits into. It's wrapped in glass on one side but not on the other. Basically this is just a styling feature. The wrap-around rear window brings in more light and provides better visibility for the driver. The rear hatch opens from the side rather than the top like a traditional hatch, which is also interesting. It may help those who struggle to reach a fully opened traditional hatch and may be easier to  access in certain confined parking locations.

Personally, I quite like it – designing outside the box (it's called the Cube – get it?). But I know I'm not a conventional buyer – I want a diesel and I buy for functionality and economy. I'm not looking for 22" rims and towing capacity. My non-conventional taste was re-enforced when my colleague came in and saw the Cube on my screen. "That's almost as ugly as the Aztec!"  Incidentally, I drove the Aztec for 3 years.

The well-equipped Nissan Cube has a starting price of only $14k. I would personally be running to the dealer right now if I were in the market for a new vehicle. Any Cube drivers out there? What can you tell me about your experience so far?

Posted by Chris Royle, Director, Global Product Strategy, Polk (10.02.09)

   

Diesel Dilemma in the U.S.

Tuesday, September 15, 2009 by Guest Blogger

Why don't small diesel cars get bought or sold in the U.S.? The last time you were in Europe up to 40% of the cars driving next to you were diesels. They were getting up to 60 MPG and didn’t have complex recharging systems or heavy batteries. Could you tell? They weren’t smoking, they didn’t sound like an F350, they were probably going to last longer than the petrol version next to them and they are great mid and small sized cars. This industry trend seems almost absent in the U.S. consumer marketplace.

If you could buy the new Taurus as a Turbo Diesel and get 40 MPG, would you? If you could buy the same Saab, Audi or BMW that you buy here in the U.S. today and get double the mileage with none of the hybrid costs or future headaches of replacing batteries – would you? I know I would.

If you wouldn't buy one, why not? Most of these vehicles have been engineered to meet U.S. vehicle safety and crash standards. The diesel that you can buy here in the U.S. is now clean enough to put in their highly tuned engines without destroying them. What is stopping the OEMs from bringing them over by the boatload? VW is making a start – their TDIs appear to be selling well but this is a small manufacturer with few models. Is it really public opinion of diesels that is driving manufacturer behavior? Has there been no consumer research to gauge loyalty for this forgotten automotive engine segment? Or are the manufacturers overstating consumer concern and missing a huge opportunity to improve U.S. fuel consumption on new vehicles... and limiting consumer choices? I know that when I buy my next vehicle, it will be a diesel since I commute 86 miles to work each day.

Posted by Chris Royle, Director, Global Product Strategy, Polk (09.15.09)

Scrappage Incentives Hurt Diesel Car Sales in Europe

Wednesday, September 2, 2009 by Guest Blogger

Everyone is talking about the market turbulences caused by the governmental scrappage schemes in different European countries. Much has been made of the fact that many consumers have "pre-bought" in 2009, which will have a negative effect on the sales trend in 2010. But, nobody is really talking about how the scrappage schemes have changed the market structure. I decided to look at the effect of the scrappage schemes on diesel-powered cars to see what the effect on that important vehicle segment might have been.

I found that the scrappage schemes had a significant and negative effect on diesel car sales. During 2008, the long-term upward trend of increased European market share for diesel vehicles came to an end, peaking at about 51% of total new car registrations. In contrast, during the first seven months of 2009, the share of diesel cars in the European market share fell to 45%.

Diesel Share Europe

Why did the scrappage incentives cause diesel sales to fall? People bought a heavier level of mini and small cars during the scrappage incentive period, which took away from diesel sales. As consumers who purchase mini and small vehicles typically use them for urban driving, they don't find that spending the extra money for diesel cars is justified by the savings in fuel costs. Also, since there are fewer diesel models in small or lower vehicle segments, consumers bought more non-diesel models as a result of the incentive programs.

Here is an example of the shift from diesel sales: In the German market for the first seven months, the share of diesel vehicles fell by 14 percentage points to 30% this year. I have not seen this low level of diesel penetration since about 10 years ago.

Diesel Share Germany

While we have to assume a total sales volume reduction in markets that are currently heavily supported by scrappage programs when the programs end, we also expect a normalisation in the market structures. We would expect to see sales in the small vehicle segment go down next year, which will automatically cause the market share of diesel vehicles to increase because of the higher diesel penetration in larger vehicle segments.

The scrappage schemes have given auto analysts a hard time – it is essential for them to get quick and detailed data in order to analyze the sales trends and distinguish short-term market reactions from real industry trends. From my perspective, the reduction in diesel sales is one example of a short-term sales trend.

Posted by Thomas Mawick, Manager, Automotive Studies, Polk, Essen, Germany (09.02.2009)

Is the U.S. Ready for Indian Vehicles?

Thursday, August 13, 2009 by Guest Blogger

The first vehicle from India will go on sale in the U.S. early next year, several months later than its original 2009 launch date. Mahindra & Mahindra will launch the yet-to-be named diesel powered pickup through distributor Global Vehicles U.S.A. Inc with a 50,000 annual sales target. This sales goal seemed aggressive for a compact pickup with no brand recognition, so I did some analysis to find out how realistic it would be for the Mahindra pickup to reach 50,000 units annually.

The Mahindra pickup will enter the U.S. pickup market at a turbulent time. The entire pickup market has been contracting since 2004 and the compact pickup market, which the Mahindra pickup will likely complete in, is dominated by the Toyota Tacoma. When I looked at sales trends from Polk's new vehicle registration data, I found that the Toyota Tacoma had a 53% share in the compact pickup market for the first five months of 2009. And, no other compact pickup besides the Tacoma had sales above 45,000 in 2008. The market size, competition and the fact that the Mahindra pickup is the only diesel fueled pickup in the compact pickup segment makes the 50,000 sales target a stretch goal for an established brand, let alone a new brand unknown to many Americans.

Jan-May 2009 Market Share by Model in Compact Pickup Truck Segment

Polk just released a Polk View titled "Is the U.S. Auto Market Ready for Indian Vehicles?" The Polk View discusses topics relating to Mahindra & Mahindra entering the U.S. market including recommendations for initial launch markets, a market entry analysis on the Mahindra Scorpio SUV that will launch in late 2010 or 2011, and likely reception of both of these vehicles in different U.S. markets.

I invite you to read the Polk View and let me know your thoughts about how the Mahindra pickup will fare in the U.S.

Posted by Margaret Zewatsky, Global Market Analyst, Polk (08.13.2009)

The U. S. Commercial Vehicle Market Crystal Ball

Monday, July 6, 2009 by Therran Oliphant

I can almost see the headlines on CNBC or Fox Business noting that occult store stock has surged, due to the preponderant purchase of soothsayer assistance items. Magic 8 balls will reach the spire of their economic demand since being paired with lava lamps, and businesses will start hiring mystics to work with their economists and business analysts. Maybe that is more than a little far-fetched, but to assure ourselves we never reach the point of crystal ball and lucky rabbit's foot dependence, the commercial vehicle industry must go through some realistic and sound self-assessment. More than ever, my customers are looking toward forecasting tools in the hopes of gleaning enough  knowledge about their market and the business climate to make informed decisions that will mitigate the effects of the slumping economy on their businesses.

While the industry is extraordinarily complex and there are no one-size-fits-all solutions, there are some major points of emphasis that may act as a general indicator, applicable to most businesses looking for some direction. The three following issues can greatly impact the decision-making process of just about any business in the commercial vehicle market.

First, diesel engine emissions standards are becoming increasingly tough. This is especially true in the heavy duty segment, and it has already shown up in new vehicle registration volumes over the past 2-1/2 years. Meanwhile, at the other end of the spectrum, class 3-5 vehicles have increased their market share 3% - to 41.6% of the total truck market - in the same time frame. Look for this industry trend to continue as the projected Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of Class 8 vehicles looks very weak until 2013. 2009 new vehicle registration volumes will fall again, to 380,600 vehicles. This number is less than half of the new vehicle registrations of 2006. VIO is still expected to climb, which suggests there will also be much less scrappage than in years past. On the positive side, the combination of those two metrics should mean an increase in used vehicle volumes and parts and service activity. Third, we can safely say that the industry will start to recover by Q1 2010, with the overall business climate of the country and the world. Commercial vehicle registrations will rebound to above 2008 levels as early as next year. Survival is the key to reaping the benefits of the upcoming growth markets, but we know bear-like hibernation is not an option until then. 

How do you plan to maximize profit before the impending demand spurs need?
Polk Solutions Consultant Dave Goebel speaks about these issues in much greater depth in this Polk View, "The Future of the Commercial Vehicle Market." 

In a stormy business climate, navigating the troubled waters effectively can mean the difference between capsizing or making it safely back to harbor. Question is, are you using a compass or a talisman to get there?

Posted by Therran Oliphant, Account Representative, Commercial Vehicle Group, Polk (07.06.2009)